Non-Exhaustive Legal Definition

In contracts and in the preparation of legal documents, the term is often used, but not limited to, to refer to legal obligations, representations, warranties, rights, remedies or other elements mentioned in a contract. Last summer, Louisiana also banned illegal adoption, with violators facing a $5,000 fine and up to five years in prison. There is a principle of legal interpretation expressio unius est exclusio alterius (“the expression of one thing is the exclusion of another”), which is used to decide whether or not a declaration contains objects that are not explicitly mentioned. For example, if you want to ban firearms in a statute or treaty, you can just say “gun,” but then the question arises as to what constitutes a “weapon” – is a wand a weapon? When you say “weapons, such as pistols, rifles, shotguns, mortars, machine guns and howitzers”, the clause is biased in favor of the understanding that the author was specifically referring to firearms (since they did not mention a large class of common weapons). The inclusion of “but not limited to” helps to refute the interpretation that a long illustrative list could be conceived as an exhaustive list. Since it creates uncertainty about what a term refers to, it`s good for the needs of a writer who wants a broad interpretation that might not include obvious examples. It teaches you to take your time, or as the Germans call it, it gives you “rest”, the great condition sine qua non! In this example, the author of this sentence wants to draw the reader`s attention to a few specific guidelines without limiting the list to the explicitly mentioned guidelines. Ordinary words have their ordinary meaning, so “inclusive” would not mean exclusively. In other words, the following list is not exhaustive. The use of the phrase “but not limited to” underscores this, but is somewhat unnecessary because of the ordinary meaning. The answer depends on your jurisdiction, but in common law countries (United States, England, Canada, Australia, New Zealand), the following principles apply. The idea is to suggest that employees be asked to comply with all policies, but also the conflict of interest policy, the privacy policy and the security policy. Ex-rebels living abroad were alarmed by the failure to receive the compensation rate and news of their homes.

Rather, the author wants the reader to understand that what is listed is part of a larger set of things or objects. The goal is for the author to give examples, list of elements, refer to elements without making the reader believe that the entry is exhaustive or represents the entire list. A lease is a contract, and the interpretation of a lease follows the standard principles of contract interpretation. Business Standard has always strived to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that interest you and that have broader political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how we can improve our offering has only strengthened our determination and commitment to these ideals. Even in these challenging times arising from Covid-19, we remain committed to keeping you informed with credible news, authoritative views and concise commentary on relevant current issues. However, we have a request. In the fight against the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more so that we can continue to offer you better quality content.

Our subscription model has received an encouraging response from many of you who have subscribed to our online content. More subscriptions to our online content can only help us achieve our goals of providing you with even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practice the journalism we are committed to. Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard. Digital editor The distinction between over-policing and non-responsiveness was alive and well in Bed-Stuy. Sukumar Mukhopadhyay | New Delhi Updated on 14 June 2013 17:49 IST The “first appeal” must be decided on the basis of the facts and the law. However, these are just lawyers trying to make the most of a phrasing error, and courts/judges would likely recognize the mistake (and the fact that it was intentional) and ignore the difference. The inconsistent use of this expression leads to ambiguity. Why is it used in one place and not another? The ambiguity allows us to argue that the absence of the term in one sentence (and its presence to introduce a list in another) must mean that the author intended there to be a difference. This difference is that the list is an exclusive list that is missing “not limited to”.

Here is a summary of what “but not limited to” means: The idea for the author of the contract is to avoid having to make exhaustive lists or define all possible elements in a list or group of things. The result is that there is no real difference. If you were in court to make final arguments, that`s something you could count on. But in the real world, there is no difference. She finally left JSwipe after about a week and found her current non-Jewish boyfriend on OkCupid. For example, a specific contractual clause could be formulated: Of me, I say only to say, especially since I do not want to affirm ny le si ny le no in what I have no evidence. Certainly Captain Merveilles and his people showed their non-vulgar pit. It also notes that the High Court is practically non-existent and that there is therefore no High Court where justice can be sought. The author`s goal is to ensure that the reader understands that the list or referenced items are some examples of items within a group, but there may be more.

The term “but not limited to” is generally used to refer to different things or elements as part of a group of things or elements. There has been a lot of positive feedback from people who are interested in gender non-binary people. An atheist advises his coreligionists not to talk to believers.